[r-t] Fwd: FW: Proposed definition of a peal

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Wed Aug 6 16:37:03 UTC 2008

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Ted Steele <ted.steele at tesco.net> wrote:
> Don Morrison wrote:
>> I think we may need to tighten this definition up a little bit for things
>> like Spliced Bristol Maximus and Stedman Cinques, which I am interpreting to
>> be a piece of change ringing of multiple stages.  ....... In this case we really need to define the Stedman as a
>> maximus method and have the cover bell as part of the method ...!

In the interests of accuracy: I did not write the above which Ted is
attributing to me. I believe Iain Anderson wrote that.

Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Grandeur does not require solemnity."   -- Russell Sherman, program notes

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list