[r-t] Anything Goes vs Peals Mean Something

[ted.steele at tesco.net]

---- Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com> wrote: 
> 
> The type of 'truth' you are talking about ceased being the 
> whole story about a hundred years ago.  Ever since E. Banks 
> James first produced a 2,160 of minor which didn't result in 
> rounds after each 720.

Yes, of course that is true. I did not make it clear that in referring to peals of 7 or less containing extents "as far as is possible" I was talking only of the total changes. I did not mean to exclude such multi-extent blocks. Peals based on these still contain only the minumum number of repeats to get the length, which is the important thing.

Ted