[r-t] Candidate definition #10

[Richard Smith]

Mark Davies wrote:

> The problem with the "blocks" idea is it doesn't allow some really
> good stuff (interleaved multi-stage extent blocks) but it allows rubbish,

But that's inevitable.  You cannot produce a set of 
definitions that permit all of "good stuff" while 
disallowing all "rubbish".  The line between "good stuff" 
and "rubbish" is simply too subjective.

Just accept the fact that it will be legal to ring certain 
sorts of rubbish and move on.  The failure to accept this is 
the main problem with the current decisions.

RAS