[r-t] Non-palindromic single-hunt Doubles methods

[edward martin]

12345
-----------------------------------
14253    345.1.5.1.5.1.5  .1.    345.125
15234    345.1.5.1.5.1.5.  1.    3.   125
14532    3.   1.5.1.5.1.5.  145. 3.   125
13425    345.1.5.1.5.1.5.  145. 3.   125
-----------------------------------
not particularly elegant but call it 3 times for a 120
eddie martin



2008/12/9 Peter Hinton <peter at hinton.me.uk>:
> While searching for seasonally festive methods to ring, I have been looking
> at Nowell Place Doubles:
> <http://ringing.org/main/pages/method?match=nowell&name-query=Search>
>
> Melvyn Hiller's collection gives a Shipway Bob as the call, but I can't get
> a 120.  Can anyone help, please?
>
> The CC method collection gives a Ringing World reference of 66/167, which
> also covers Jack a Napes Bob Doubles; were these originally rung spliced?
>  My collection of Ringing Worlds doesn't go back that far.
>
> Some of the other non-palindromic methods have been named in recent years by
> Paul Mason; I think most of these were rung in multi-extent blocks.  Was
> that how Nowell was rung?
>
> But Hiller also gives variations of Nowell, like Snowdrop (using a
> Wallflower Single).  Again, I can't find any 120s, but presumably these must
> have been rung as 120s, due to Decision (E)A.3(c)?
> "Each variation must by itself be capable of producing a true six-score"
>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>