[r-t] Fifield Doubles

edward martin edward.w.martin at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 18:28:50 UTC 2008


oops  I missed out a plain lead...it should have read:
2345
4532
3254
5432
2534 -

mew

2008/12/23 edward martin <edward.w.martin at gmail.com>:
> I don't know what it is officially supposed to be but you can get a
> true 120 by ringing 3rds instead of 5ths whenever any one particular
> bell is turned from the lead by treble.
> ie :
> p = 5.1.125.3.5.3.125.1.5.123,
> b = 5.1.125.3.5.3.125.1.3.123
>
> 120 in three parts,
> call 2 before 3 times:
> 2345
> 4532
> 3254
> 2534 -
>
> Eddie Martin
>
> 2008/12/23 Alan C. Foster <alan.c.foster at gmail.com>:
>> I'm trying (and struggling) to get a true 120 of Fifield Doubles
>> (5.1.125.3 hl5 le123).  I downloaded the method into Abel from the
>> microSIRIL library, and that gives a 145 bob, 123 single, 125 extreme
>> and a 1 omit.  I think the single is wrong, as that's the plain lead
>> end.  Anyone care to point me in the right direction?
>>
>> I had a quick look at Tony Smith's page on the Method Committees website
>> (<http://www.methods.org.uk/other/douvar.htm>), but as I don't know
>> Fifield's method number or group, it didn't help (though I think I get
>> the gist of it).
>>
>>
>> TIA.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> Alan Foster
>> St Andrew's, East Hagbourne,
>> Oxon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>>
>




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list