[r-t] Maidstone Major & Bob Major Triples

[Graham John]

Eddie wrote:
 
> Same thing innit

No.

> The Bob Major calls wouldn't work, surely you mean '
> Bob Triples? ie bob = 1258 (when 2 comes home) &
> single = 123458

While ringing Bob Triples on the back 7 would clearly work, I was
suggesting, based on their description, that they may have rung Bob Major
removing all the rows where the treble is not leading i.e. using a
composition of the extent of Bob Major and standard 14 bobs and 1234
singles. The line looks different though, because the hunting is backwards. 

e.g. the standard 160 of Bob Major would be an eighth of its normal length =
20 changes:

 12345678
 13254768
-12357486
 13275846
 13728564
 17382654
 17836245
 18763425
-17864352
 18746532
-17845623
 18754263
-17852436
 18725346
 18273564
 12837654
 12386745
 13268475
-12364857
 13246587
-12345678

Graham