[r-t] Maidstone Major & Bob Major Triples

[edward martin]

Ah, I see your point.
The frustrating thing is that we may never know, However, I am
persuaded by your argument
Eddie

2008/7/31 Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>:
> Eddie wrote:
>
>> Same thing innit
>
> No.
>
>> The Bob Major calls wouldn't work, surely you mean '
>> Bob Triples? ie bob = 1258 (when 2 comes home) &
>> single = 123458
>
> While ringing Bob Triples on the back 7 would clearly work, I was
> suggesting, based on their description, that they may have rung Bob Major
> removing all the rows where the treble is not leading i.e. using a
> composition of the extent of Bob Major and standard 14 bobs and 1234
> singles. The line looks different though, because the hunting is backwards.
>
> e.g. the standard 160 of Bob Major would be an eighth of its normal length =
> 20 changes:
>
>  12345678
>  13254768
> -12357486
>  13275846
>  13728564
>  17382654
>  17836245
>  18763425
> -17864352
>  18746532
> -17845623
>  18754263
> -17852436
>  18725346
>  18273564
>  12837654
>  12386745
>  13268475
> -12364857
>  13246587
> -12345678
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>