[r-t] New plan
Alexander Holroyd
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Fri Dec 25 04:49:44 UTC 2009
Very nice and interesting Matt; I agree completely that this idea deserves
further attention.
One thing I rather like is the "almost runs" that come up (also in limited
slip), such as -E09875. Of course, some of these sound better than
others, and it would be nice to have a way of concentrating on the good
ones...
Another nice thing in limited slip is that you sometimes get runs with 4
substituted for E or 5 substituted for T, or vice versa. Since these
pairs of bells are an octave apart, the otherwise ugly effect of breaking
up a run becomes instead quite pleasing (to my ear anyway).
More generally, I wonder if these is mileage in looking for musical
effects that take into account conventional ideas of haromny a bit more
than has been usual. Presumably this will be most effective on higher
numbers. A couple of obvious examples: on 12, -8765 and -2345 sound way
better than most other runs (try them on piano / Abel). And what about
e.g. -3580T -2579T.
> Following on from the Limited Slip discussion...
>
> 7200 Plain Bob Maximus
> No more than 14 changes between 4-runs.
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list