[r-t] Wraps in Minor

Fielding Ian I.Fielding at rbht.nhs.uk
Wed Jul 29 15:18:35 UTC 2009


Here is a 2880 with each row at each position

SWH, H, H, SWH x 6 with a S for B home Halfway and end.

Ian Fielding
Chief Technician - Pharmacy Patient Services Manager
0207 352 8121 x 4591
07872 995464 (Mobile)
Bleep 7415
________________________________
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Philip Earis
Sent: 29 July 2009 16:16
To: 'ringing-theory at bellringers.net'
Subject: [r-t] Wraps in Minor

A musical effect that is very nice is when there is a "wrap" of music from the handstroke to backstroke.  For example:

213654 (handstroke)
321645 (backstroke)

As has been discussed before on here, the number of wraps in a standard extent of minor changes significantly depending on the method being rung.  For minor, I summarised lots of the results on my website at http://www.cantabgold.net/users/pje24/music.html

Now a noted handbell ringer from Scotland (for the sake of anonymity let's call him "Mr T") has recently been reading that page, and posed the following conjectures:

"If one was to ring a 1,440 of each of the treble dodging minor methods (TDMMs), with each row once at handstroke and once at backstroke, would every TDMM produce the same number of wraps, or would some methods be better than others? Would the result be different for a 2,880 with each row rung once at each possible treble position?"

Elegant solutions are requested.






DISCLAIMER:

This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.





DISCLAIMER:

The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.  Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email, and your reply cannot be guaranteed.

The information and material in this email is intended for the use of the intended addressee or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee.  It may contain privileged or confidential information and/or copyright material.

If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your email software or notify Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust Help Desk on +44(0) 20 7351 8696

Communication is not sent through a secure server; Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of outgoing electronic mail.  Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent the view of Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust unless specifically stated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20090729/5c6f3644/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list