[r-t] Proportion of Surprise Methods

[Philip Earis]

"Why is it being said the definition of surprise is places made adjacent to the treble at the cross-sections? It is true that it is the situation in minor but my understanding has always been that the definition related to internal places at the cross-sections; i.e. anything other than the first and last positions. This is equally applicable at all stages.  Has the definition been changed?"

Ted, you've got this round your neck.

I do not dispute the fact the current CC "Decision" specifies just internal places for surprise methods.  I feel this is not the best description, though, for the reasons I (and Richard Smith) outlined earlier.





DISCLAIMER:

This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.