[r-t] The most uninteresting peal composition?

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Thu Apr 22 20:21:19 UTC 2010


On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> In the following the 7 never rings third, fourth or eighth place bell,
> and the 8 never rings second, sixth or seventh place bell:
>
>    http://ringing.org/main/pages/display?id=306

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.
I will think before I click send. If I am in a hurry I will wait until
  I have more time.

Sorry. Obviously the 7 *does* ring third place bell in this. More
times, even, than in most peals of Cambridge. It's fourth, eigth and
fifth place bells it never rings.


-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Transmission is to civilization what reproduction is to life."
              -- Will Durant, _The Age of Faith_




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list