[r-t] Asymmetric Doubles

Ted Steele ted.steele at tesco.net
Thu Aug 5 17:11:53 UTC 2010

  On 05/08/2010 17:07, Philip Earis wrote:
> Ted: ...  since that bob appears to just swap over two
> bells, should it not be called a Single?
> Doubles can be a bit of a different case...what do you call the "traditional" 145 call in, for example, plain bob doubles, then?
> As you surmise, semantics don't worry me too much, in any case.

Well, a bob of course; but it replaces PN 125 and does not change the 
nature of the rows that would otherwise have been produced. PN 145 
replacing 1 does so. The former example affects 3 bells, the latter just 2.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list