[r-t] Asymmetric Doubles

Philip Earis Earisp at rsc.org
Thu Aug 5 16:07:56 UTC 2010

Ted: "Serious question Philip; since that bob appears to just swap over two 
bells, should it not be called a Single? Simple explanation of the why's 
and wherefore's, if any, would be appreciated"

Doubles can be a bit of a different case...what do you call the "traditional" 145 call in, for example, plain bob doubles, then?

As you surmise, semantics don't worry me too much, in any case.


This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list