[r-t] Asymmetric Doubles

[Matt Dawson]

> DJ: "Describing a call as a "123456" bob, or "123456" single, or whatever doesn't make a difference.  It's the descriptive "123456" bit which is unambiguous - it doesn't need an adjective associated with it."

In my opinion, it'd still be useful to have some sort of nomenclature
in this case, in order to avoid saying "two three four five six call"
repeatedly during the course of a conversation. I don't feel that this
needs to be prescribed by the CC, though.

matt