[r-t] Diamond Delight (was Are FCH's needed any more?)

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Sun May 23 04:18:53 UTC 2010

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
>> Can anyone do better btw?
> The first is a three part originally intended for Higher Walton. It's
> not difficult if you don't have a prejudice against simple,
> tenors-parted sections. It has fewer 65s and 5678s off the front, but
> more runs of four or more consecutive bells at the back or front, as
> well as adding 8765 and 7568 courses to the mix. And besides the
> reduced learning a three part requires, these part ends do a good
> job of spreading the musical rows based on 5678 nicely throughout
> the peal.
> <http://ringing.org/main/pages/dfm/major/single-surprise/h#4230>

Sorry, I botched the URL on that one. It should have been


Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Life is too short and Proust is too long"
      -- attributed to Anatole France by Russell
         Baker, "Crawling Up Everest"

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list