[r-t] Universality

Graham John graham at changeringing.co.uk
Thu May 27 22:08:29 UTC 2010

Don wrote:

> folks are comfortable talking about Cambridge above, and
> not assuming something with a certain property for
> Cambridge above methods is necessarily true to Cambridge
> itself, aren't they?

That's a reasonable point, as you were only using them to illustrate the
musical properties. I was only posing the question, not suggesting that the
statement was incorrect. 


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list