[r-t] Spliced Cinques & Max

[Stephen Beckingham]

Thanks for clarification on that. It was just something I hadn't previously come across and with previous correspondence on this and other lists about the CC decisions I couldn't help but wonder.....
SJB


> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:07:14 +0100
> From: pabs at cantab.net
> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> Subject: Re: [r-t] Spliced Cinques & Max
> 
> (D)C.1: Compositions in more than one method in which the change of 
> method occurs at the lead-head and/or the half-lead shall be called 
> 'Spliced'. In the case of compositions containing changes of method at 
> both the half-lead and the lead-head, all the methods shall be 
> symmetrical about the half-lead with no two of them differing only in 
> the places made at the half-lead and/or the lead-head.
> 
> So Compositions in more than one method in which the change of method 
> does not occur at the lead-head and/or the half-lead are not called 
> 'Spliced'. That does not mean that they do not comply with the Decisisons.
> 
> Philip

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20100922/386aae96/attachment-0004.html>