[r-t] Fwd: Cambridge New Start/Rhubarb

Ian McCulloch ianmcc at physics.uq.edu.au
Fri Jan 21 15:41:32 UTC 2011

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Andrew Johnson wrote:

>> On 13 January 2011 19:06, Daniel Brady <danielw.brady at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I believe Richard Grimmett asked a few months back for an extent of
>>> Cambridge Minor using only splices into the method at any backstroke.
>>> Due to my somewhat overzealous deleting of emails I cannot remember if
> there
>>> were any constraints to the touch, for example work for each bell
> notably
>>> the treble, and number of COM (for want of a better term)?
>>> Daniel
>> The message is archived at:
>> <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/
>> 2010-May/003425.html>
>> An extent of only Cambridge would be interesting to see though, if
>> you have one.
>> matt
> A Cambridge extent with variable start is trivial:
> x36x14x12x36x14x56x14x36x12x14x36x LE 12
> so take any touch of Cambridge minor, then for a lead with a bob
> replace
> x36x14x12x36x14x56x14x36x12x14x36x LE 14
> with
> x36x14x12x36x14x56x14x36x12x14/"Cambridge"
> x36x14/"Cambridge"
> then ring the next lead as normal Cambridge again
> Andrew Johnson

But can we have one with a bit more excitement?


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list