[r-t] Fwd: Cambridge New Start/Rhubarb
ianmcc at physics.uq.edu.au
Fri Jan 21 15:41:32 UTC 2011
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Andrew Johnson wrote:
>> On 13 January 2011 19:06, Daniel Brady <danielw.brady at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I believe Richard Grimmett asked a few months back for an extent of
>>> Cambridge Minor using only splices into the method at any backstroke.
>>> Due to my somewhat overzealous deleting of emails I cannot remember if
>>> were any constraints to the touch, for example work for each bell
>>> the treble, and number of COM (for want of a better term)?
>> The message is archived at:
>> An extent of only Cambridge would be interesting to see though, if
>> you have one.
> A Cambridge extent with variable start is trivial:
> x36x14x12x36x14x56x14x36x12x14x36x LE 12
> so take any touch of Cambridge minor, then for a lead with a bob
> x36x14x12x36x14x56x14x36x12x14x36x LE 14
> then ring the next lead as normal Cambridge again
> Andrew Johnson
But can we have one with a bit more excitement?
More information about the ringing-theory