[r-t] Unprinciple extent!

Philip Earis Earisp at rsc.org
Fri Jul 15 21:35:27 UTC 2011

"Yes - that's why I wrote shortest/simplest. It probably should just be simplest. If the method is too short, the frequency and number of calls adds unnecessary complexity"

You can argue both ways, and indeed is this compatible with your earlier statement? How many people break Stedman down into chunks of Erin and Bastow?


This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list