[r-t] Unprinciple extent!

Graham John graham at changeringing.co.uk
Fri Jul 15 21:32:26 UTC 2011

Ander wrote:
> I'm not completely convinced by this. "Shortest" is obviously wrong -

Yes - that's why I wrote shortest/simplest. It probably should just be
simplest. If the method is too short, the frequency and number of calls adds
unnecessary complexity. You can define a five part extent of Plain Bob Minor
as a method or as a composition of Original, but there isn't much value in
doing either.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list