[r-t] Unprinciple extent!

[Graham John]

Ander wrote:
 
> I'm not completely convinced by this. "Shortest" is obviously wrong -

Yes - that's why I wrote shortest/simplest. It probably should just be
simplest. If the method is too short, the frequency and number of calls adds
unnecessary complexity. You can define a five part extent of Plain Bob Minor
as a method or as a composition of Original, but there isn't much value in
doing either.

Graham