[r-t] Double Cambridge cyclic bob Minor

Alexander Holroyd holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Thu May 19 17:34:46 UTC 2011

One can ring a true 1440, which I think is a legal way to name such 
things, but I don't know whether that is what was done.

On Thu, 19 May 2011, edward martin wrote:

> Please forgive me, but  how was this method officially accepted & named when
> others of similar falseness have not been accepted and named?
> Eddie Martin

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list