[r-t] Old DNCB composition

Matthew Frye matthew at frye.org.uk
Fri Nov 11 16:13:24 UTC 2011


On 11 Nov 2011, at 16:03, Richard Allton wrote:
> The 13440 is not a 6720 doubled by a pair of singles, it is a 13440 using
> only 2 singles.

Do you know what the 13440 composition is then? With only 2 singles, surely they've got to be spaced 6720 changes apart to get the correct nature of rows.

MF



More information about the ringing-theory mailing list