[r-t] Old DNCB composition

Matthew Frye matthew at frye.org.uk
Fri Nov 11 16:51:52 UTC 2011

On 11 Nov 2011, at 16:31, Richard Allton wrote:

> The second single does not return to the same course as before the first
> single.

Of course. It actually is a 6720 doubled by a pair of singles, it's just there's no requirement for the 6720 to be a round block itself (=> can undermine normal q-set rules). Should have seen that.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list