[r-t] Old DNCB composition

[Ted Steele]

On 11/11/2011 16:51, Matthew Frye wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2011, at 16:31, Richard Allton wrote:
>
>> The second single does not return to the same course as before the first
>> single.
> Of course. It actually is a 6720 doubled by a pair of singles, it's just there's no requirement for the 6720 to be a round block itself (=>  can undermine normal q-set rules). Should have seen that.

Me too. Thanks for the explanations.

Ted