[r-t] 41 Surprise Minor

[John Warboys]

Absolutely nothing wrong with what you suggest Ander, but I have a
self-written rule to avoid "obvious" falseness (namely repeated lead-ends or
lead-heads) between calls in any block.

 

However I don't necessarily impose that restriction between different
blocks, there are for example in composition SU0308 repeated lead-end and
lead-head rows between the last bob in the Carlisle-over blocks and the
first bob in the London-over block, but because we've completed one logical
block of the composition and moved on to another it's less obvious and thus
acceptable to my mind.

 

John