[r-t] 41 Surprise Minor
john.warboys at lineone.net
Fri Oct 14 17:48:20 UTC 2011
Absolutely nothing wrong with what you suggest Ander, but I have a
self-written rule to avoid "obvious" falseness (namely repeated lead-ends or
lead-heads) between calls in any block.
However I don't necessarily impose that restriction between different
blocks, there are for example in composition SU0308 repeated lead-end and
lead-head rows between the last bob in the Carlisle-over blocks and the
first bob in the London-over block, but because we've completed one logical
block of the composition and moved on to another it's less obvious and thus
acceptable to my mind.
More information about the ringing-theory