[r-t] Plain Bob lead heads/ends (was ringing-theory Digest, Vol 89, Issue 9)

[King, Peter R]

I think you can't have one without the other if you have 12 or 1n lead ends. The example was 16 (or 1 n-2)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net [mailto:ringing-theory-
> bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Alan Reading
> Sent: 09 February 2012 12:41
> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> Subject: Re: [r-t] Plain Bob lead heads/ends (was ringing-theory
> Digest, Vol 89, Issue 9)
> 
> On 9 February 2012 12:37, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Robin Woolley <robin at robinw.org.uk>
> wrote:
> > > Don wrote "I presume you really mean "Plain Bob lead heads AND lead
> > ends"?
> > > You can't have one without the other.
> >
> > I'm confused. Doesn't that Ashtead variation I sent have Plain Bob
> > lead heads, but NON-Plain Bob lead ends?
> >
> 
> Thats what I was thinking!
> I suppose you can't have one without the other if the method is
> conventionally symmetrical - but I didn't think that was really the
> point.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> > "I was brought up in the violin factory, and, at times, when I had a
> > fight with my brothers and sisters, we would hit one another with
> > violins."
> >           -- Shinichi Suzuki, _Nurtured by Love_, tr Waltraud Susuzki
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ringing-theory mailing list
> > ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> > http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-
> theory_bellringers.net
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net