[r-t] Treble place paths

[Alexander Holroyd]

Avoiding 56 places is a prejudice I would be happy to ignore.  Perhaps the 
method could be double?

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Philip Earis wrote:

> "It's a shame you can't simultaneously avoid 56 place notations and three blows in one place.  Consider when the treble makes point 4ths.  To avoid three blows in one place, the bell at the front must be doing a Stedman whole turn which has the front four bells crossing either side of the point.  To avoid falseness you need -56 or 56- place notation around the point"
>
> This isn't the case on 8 bells, though.
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening. The Royal Society of Chemistry is a charity, registered in England and Wales, number 207890 - Registered office: Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>