[r-t] Bobs only peal of Plain Bob Triples

Andrew Johnson andrew_johnson at uk.ibm.com
Wed Jun 13 20:59:01 UTC 2012

> A frequent misconception in ringing theory is that you need singles to
> ring a peal of plain bob triples.
> Clearly this is not the case - see eg this 9 part by Prof Holroyd:
> My question though is: has a bobs-only extent of PB7 ever been rung? I'm
> probably unaware of multiple peals of something obvious, but even after 
> quick search I'm not aware of any examples.
Yes, they are pretty well known.

The RW Diary touch of 154 with one single is another curiosity.

Andrew Johnson

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list