[r-t] Bobs only peal of Plain Bob Triples

[Andrew Johnson]

> A frequent misconception in ringing theory is that you need singles to
> ring a peal of plain bob triples.
> 
> Clearly this is not the case - see eg this 9 part by Prof Holroyd:
> 
> My question though is: has a bobs-only extent of PB7 ever been rung? I'm
> probably unaware of multiple peals of something obvious, but even after 
a
> quick search I'm not aware of any examples.
Yes, they are pretty well known.
http://www.bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=121569
http://ringing.org/main/pages/printable?id=8650&collection=peals

The RW Diary touch of 154 with one single is another curiosity.

Andrew Johnson

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU