[r-t] Bobs only peal of Plain Bob Triples

[Alan Reading]

In addition to DFM example I produced the following unrung/published comp
on this plan some time ago.

5040 Plain Bob Triples

A G Reading

W  F  B  I  M  H 23456

3        -     - 23546

            -  - 65342

2              - 35462

-           -    43256

      X     2    63452

-              2 64532

            -  - 25436

      -        3 56234

   -        3    42356



3 Part



X=B/F/I


Cheers,

Alan


On 13 June 2012 21:23, Philip Earis <pje24 at cantab.net> wrote:

> A frequent misconception in ringing theory is that you need singles to
> ring a peal of plain bob triples.
>
> Clearly this is not the case - see eg this 9 part by Prof Holroyd:
>
> ===
> 5040 Plain Bob Triples
> Alexander E. Holroyd
>
> W B I M  23456
> --------------
> - - -    63254
>  - -    45362
>  - - -  56342
>  - -    24653
> - -(-)   34256
> --------------
> 9 part.  Omit (-) in parts 3,6 and 9 (3rd part end 234756)
> ===
>
> My question though is: has a bobs-only extent of PB7 ever been rung?  I'm
> probably unaware of multiple peals of something obvious, but even after a
> quick search I'm not aware of any examples.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20120614/5dfbd7b9/attachment.html>