[r-t] Fasleness Groups
Alan Barber
delibaba at hotmail.co.uk
Thu May 17 07:25:54 UTC 2012
> Just Visiting Surprise Major and Quixhill Surprise Major are both group l with BD/ac falseness.
> At the risk of appearing to be stupid, why does not this composition of Quixhill ture to Just Visiting? I had always thought that a composition true to one method would be true to another with the same falseness group.
> Aye
> Sam
> 5088 Quixhill Surprise Major
> by Richard I Allton (No 808) 23456 M 3/5 B W H
> (52364) 1 ss 3
> 36245 ss 1
> 43652 1 ss
> (56234) 1 1
> 62345 ss 1 1
> 52643 2
> 53246 - 1 1
> 23645 1
> 3 part.
Well Sam at least you've had the sense to query it. A few years ago I was in a lost attempt of Machynlleth S Major which the conductor miscalled. When I subsequently asked the conductor what he was calling he said that he was calling a composition of Uxbridge. He had made the mistake of looking at the falseness groups and assumed that it would be true - thank goodness he miscalled it!. It is not so much the falseness but as to where it occurs. I did write a small article for the RW on the matter which was published circa October 2008. Machynlleth x 3 x 4 x 256 x 6 x 34 x 25 x 34 x 5 lh F fch BaUxbridge x 3 x 4 x 56 x 6 x 34 x 5 x 4 x 5 lh F fch Bac Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20120517/6b37cdc7/attachment.html>
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list