[r-t] Minor

[Daniel Brady]

Error is in cs5 you need to define Wrong Fourths as a single course (bbp)
On Sep 3, 2012 6:30 PM, "Alan Foster" <alan.c.foster at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rob Weatherby:-
> >Hi Guys,
> >Could someone please explain this in beginners terms for me. I just
don't understand the format.Can you help me out by explaining >this in
relation to the lead ends as pbs etc....
> >
> >1,259 Plain Bob MinorDonald F Morrison (no. 2298)2345  W     H
> >3245  3*    3
> >4235  3*    -
> >3425  6     -
> >4523    In
> >3254  6 4ths
> >Round at the treble's handstroke
> >lead two leads after the final bob.
> >3* = s - -
> >6 = s - - s - -
>
> Folks,
>
> This is my attempt to enter this composition into Peal Prover:-
>
> !    DFM 2298
> !
> method_name = { Plain Bob Minor }
> continue_after_rounds
>
> sc1 = [s p p p p]                 ! Single Wrong
> sc2 = [b p p p p]                 ! Bob Wrong
> sc3 = [b p p p b]                 ! Bob Wrong & Bob Home
> sc4 = [p p p p b]                 ! Bob Home
> sc5 = [p p p b p p]              ! Bob In
> sc6 = [p b p]                      ! Bob 4ths (make)
>
> cs1 = [sc1 sc2 sc3 sc4 sc4 ce]                    ! 3*W 3H
> cs2 = [sc1 sc2 sc3 ce]                                ! 3*W   H
> cs3 = [sc1 sc2 sc2 sc1 sc2 sc3 ce]             ! 6W    H
> cs4 = [sc5 ce]                                            ! In
> cs5 = [sc1 sc2 sc2 sc1 sc2 sc2 sc6 ce]      ! 6W 4ths
>
> composition = {cs1 cs2 cs3 cs4 cs5 p}
>
>
> Would some kind soul with experience in Peal Prover, gently, point out
> where this is wrong.  I get a 1319 with 48 repeated changes instead of
> a 1259.
>
>
> The comments have been inserted after copying to this e-mail.
>
> Alan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20120903/96ce40d8/attachment.html>