[r-t] Early peals of Cambridge Maximus

Alan Reading alan.reading at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 23 19:09:25 UTC 2013


>
> Are CRUs good on eight?


IMO:

56's yes
65's probably
46's probably not
64's no
45's no
54's definitely not!

Of course some of the courses can other merits e.g. runs or tittums music -
I am just talking about the cru rows themselves.

On 23 January 2013 19:01, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jim Clatworthy <jimclat at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > What happened in more recent times is that we all got seduced by the CRU
> > (from eight bell ringing) and assumed that what's good for eight is
> equally
> > good for 10, 12 and more.
>
> Are CRUs good on eight?
>
>
>
> --
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "[Unlike tyrants] the cause of the people is indeed but little
> calculated as a subject for poetry...it presents no immediate
> or distinct images to the mind."
>           -- William Hazlitt, _Character of Shakespeare's Plays_
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20130123/23434b0a/attachment.html>



More information about the ringing-theory mailing list