[r-t] Restriction #4
dfm at ringing.org
Tue Dec 2 12:58:40 UTC 2014
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Tim Barnes <tjbarnes23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> This might suggest there's a potential restriction #7
Do you really want to be adding new restrictions that aren't there
today? Particularly ones that might have unintended consequences for
things rung in non-traditional contexts, such as link methods, which
have caused so much dyspepsia when applying the current restrictions?
This seems a solution not just searching for a problem, but intent on
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Like all well-conceived classifications, this one is useful
and clear; like all classifications it is false."
-- Fernando Pessoa, "Toward Explaining Heteronymy",
tr Jonathan Griffin
More information about the ringing-theory