[r-t] One Spliced Surprise Major
Simon.Gay at glasgow.ac.uk
Thu Jun 5 13:08:07 UTC 2014
X is also Cambridge, and certainly a peal of X alone would be described
as a peal of Cambridge (with a snap start and finish).
So I suppose that this is a peal of Cambridge.
Of course, to ring it, you would need some way of announcing the
"restarts". A convenient way of doing this would be to pretend that X is
a different method and introduce some ad hoc name for it.
So this is another example of the description of a peal not matching the
way in which it is learnt and rung.
Maybe an honest way to describe it would be spliced Cambridge and "Snap
Have there been any peals of spliced Grandsire and New Grandsire?
On 05/06/2014 13:39, Don Morrison wrote:
> You'll all be relieved to read that this message has nothing to do
> with non-methods.
> If a band were to ring the following, how should they send it up? Is
> it just a peal of 5,088 Cambridge Surprise Major?
> 5,088 Cambridge Surprise Major (?)
> 2537468 XXCC
> 5643287 CCXXCXCXCCCC
> 4735268 XXCCCCCXCCCCX
> 3465287 CCCCXCCCXC
> 3524687 CCCCXXC
> 4235678 CCCXCXX
> Repeat twice.
> C = Cambridge Surprise Major
> X = x4x25x36x4x5x6x7,3x2 (lead head 17528364)
> Contains all 24 56s, and 12 each 65s, 8765s and 5678s off the front.
More information about the ringing-theory