[r-t] One Spliced Surprise Major
john at jaharrison.me.uk
Thu Jun 5 17:20:34 UTC 2014
> I have to confess to never understanding why the restriction to only
> shortening a lead was included when this change was made a few years
> ago. It seems, to me, every bit as arbitrary as the recently recinded
> rule about the relative numbers of hunt and working bells.
ISTR raising that point (from the floor or pre-lobbying, I can't remember).
I can't remember the reason given either, but I remember not being
More information about the ringing-theory