[r-t] History

Alan Reading alan.reading at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 9 13:31:39 UTC 2014

In fact under the new rules could you claim a 5024 of covered triples as a
peal by defining it as a major "block" that happens to have 5024 blows in
8ths place?!

On 9 June 2014 14:29, John Fisher <ghoti at mad.scientist.com> wrote:

> You ring 5024 changes of major and send it up as a peal.  I don't know
> anybody who wouldn't accept that.
> Same band, same bells, same number of changes but this time the tenor isn't
> turned in; they've rung 5024 changes of triples.  Now it's not a peal.
> What's the fundamental difference between the 16 possible rows that weren't
> rung in one case and the 35296 that weren't in the other?
> JR1F
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list