[r-t] Monster extent of triples

[Andrew Graham]

>From: Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
>
>This is an interesting theoretical exercise and it is good that we will
>never run out of more challenging things to ring, but somehow I can't see
>the appeal of ringing things that are that chaotic. However, if a random
>sequence was generated that when repeated 6 times produced the extent i.e. a
>plain course of a Triples principle,
 
Couldn't you do this by taking a 7-part of Stedman Triples and calling the part a 'division' of a principle?
 
AJG