[r-t] Multiple consecutive blows.

[Matthew Frye]

On 15 Oct 2014, at 15:27, Tim Barnes <tjbarnes23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The next one, #4, is
> the restriction of no more than 4 consecutive blows in the same place.

> What do people think?

Can't see any earthly reason to limit it to 4 blows, nor to set any absolute limit. I would, however, suggest that all bells must move at least once over the course of a lead so you can't explicitly put in a cover bell to an existing method and claim a new one (unless you undid the movement with a call each lead). Admittedly that restriction doesn't necessarily sit well with dixonoids or cylindrical.

MF