[r-t] Multiple consecutive blows.
mark at snowtiger.net
Wed Oct 15 20:15:47 UTC 2014
> Can't see any earthly reason to limit it to 4 blows, nor to
> set any absolute limit. I would, however, suggest that
> all bells must move at least once over the course of a lead
> so you can't explicitly put in a cover bell to an existing
> method and claim a new one
Agree with this. The Toyota/Norwich axioms limited the number of
consecutive blows to the lead length, for the same reason. Need to keep
a distinction between stages.
> Admittedly that restriction doesn't necessarily sit well with
> dixonoids or cylindrical.
But my view is that we aren't defining either of those here - they are
More information about the ringing-theory