[r-t] Multiple consecutive blows.

[Mark Davies]

MF writes,

> Can't see any earthly reason to limit it to 4 blows, nor to
 > set any absolute limit. I would, however, suggest that
 > all bells must move at least once over the course of a lead
 > so you can't explicitly put in a cover bell to an existing
 > method and claim a new one

Agree with this. The Toyota/Norwich axioms limited the number of 
consecutive blows to the lead length, for the same reason. Need to keep 
a distinction between stages.

> Admittedly that restriction doesn't necessarily sit well with
 > dixonoids or cylindrical.

But my view is that we aren't defining either of those here - they are 
separate fields.

MBD