[r-t] FCHs

Chris02 chris02 at shropshirelad.plus.com
Wed Apr 22 23:21:16 UTC 2015

Robin Woolley wrote:
> The best I have found was by John Segar. It does not deal with 
> split-tenors - but allows FCHs to be extracted with facility."

Andrew Rawlinson wrote:
> Segar's method can actually be used to extract split tenors falseness, as far
> as I know, providing you have the time!
> The only difference is that you look for two bells within the two proving rows that
> have the same amount of bells between them, eg. 7xx8xxx and xx7xx8x and
> then apply the same rules otherwise. In terms of the incidence, you take the
> leads from the top of the columns that the bell on furthest right in the proving row
> (making sure you're looking at them in the same way, for cyclical reasons!) and
> that is the lead that the falseness will be found in.

Or if you don't have the time (or inclination) the Method Master program will extract FCH's. This includes split tenors on eight bells and the incidence. It will also do inter-method falseness.

Chris Adams 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5863 / Virus Database: 4334/9600 - Release Date: 04/22/15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20150423/61bdb258/attachment-0004.html>

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list