[r-t] Method extension

[Chris02]

Tim Barnes wrote:
> But it does seem, as Tony and Philip E have noted, that some parent
> methods will always be able to extend in more than one way.  It's
> curious in some ways that the Exercise has adopted a 1:1 naming
> solution to a 1:many problem.

Can we correct this assertion. The current rules on extension clearly allow
a method to be extended in several ways. Philip E was just plain wrong when
he made the original statement.

Chris Adams



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5863 / Virus Database: 4339/9659 - Release Date: 04/29/15