[r-t] Fwd: Re: Wraps [was Quarter Peals of Treble Dodging Major]
Mark Davies
mark at snowtiger.net
Wed Feb 4 00:14:54 UTC 2015
Yes sorry Philip, counting wraps is tricky, and can be done in different
ways:
1. Counting the total number of unique (handstroke,backstroke) pairs, of
which there are quite a lot, is perhaps not useful, due to inevitable
falseness. (If you allow falseness, you can repeat one exactly, anyway!)
2. The "traditional" way of listing wraps (Graham's diagram, which gives
us 10 on Minor) is good in general, but not all of these wraps may be
available if you have (e.g.) a fixed treble structure.
3. When counting for a fixed structure, you have to remember to knock
out not only those wraps which cannot be reached, but also those which
could be reached but would be false (otherwise we are back in case 1).
So looking at a treble-dodging path, out of the 10 total wraps, one is
directly knocked out by the treble path restriction:
xxxx12
345612
And a further two are removed because they cannot be rung within a TD
extent without falseness:
456123 546123 465123
456213 456213 456213 (only one choice here)
That leaves 7, assuming you can actually squeeze both of these in:
561234 651234
56xxxx 56xxxx
In theory that is possible with two sections like this:
652134 652143
561234 56 651234 12
562143 12 562134 56
651243 56 561243 12
I don't fancy your chances with the rest of the composition though!
MBD
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list