[r-t] Definitions so far

King, Peter R peter.king at imperial.ac.uk
Sat Jan 17 09:30:53 UTC 2015

You're right on both counts. I was being sloppy.
From: ringing-theory [ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] on behalf of Alexander Holroyd [holroyd at math.ubc.ca]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:15 AM
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Definitions so far

Just to be clear, my suggestion is to define a method to be a sequence of
*changes*, not rows.  That way the same method can be started from any

Also I think there is no need for the "as written out" stipluation.
Writing out rows is just one way of specifying a sequence, among many
others.  A sequence is a sequence - there's no need to give special
privilege to a particular way of decscribing it.

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list