[r-t] Compositions of the Decade: Part 8 - Cinques
Alexander Holroyd
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Fri Jun 19 21:51:01 UTC 2015
Nice write-up, Jack!
I actually find it very helpful and intersting to hear a brief summary of
a band's experiences in ringing something new like this.
Ander
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Jack Gunning wrote:
> Mark, I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing you had in mind:
>
> I wanted to call an easy LB every course peal (as Alexander noted it was
> composed with the non-mega conductor in mind).
>
> The composition was enjoyed by the band, it is a little bit different and
> fun. It drew complements afterwards. Colin said it was one of the most
> interesting comps of S11 he'd rung. The clever bit is, of course, the Q
> block - I just joined it together as simply as I could using fixed back-bell
> positions I enjoy. I really like inverted tit-tums and some of best ringing
> was in this part (I put it in the middle of the comp to maximise the
> chances of this).
>
> I had decided that I wouldn't be able to watch all the bells all of the time
> or to reliably transpose all of the course ends/orders on the fly, but that
> knowing the course ends were coming up right would be enough. I therefore
> learnt the c/os [before] or (after) the course ends as follows, where -
> denotes a back bell:
>
> [6-2-3145] 23146578E90
> [6-4-3215] 43216578E90 s9 s16 18
> [6-3-1425] 31426578E90 s16 18
> (64235-1) 25416378E90 7 s9 s16 s18
> (24531-6) 51462378E90 s14 s16 s18
> (13542-6) 52361478E90 s7 s14 s16 s19
> (53246-1) 26315478E90 s14 s16 s18
> [6-2-1435] 21436578E90 s7 s14 s16 s18 19
>
> All of which are memorable for their own reasons (similarity with plain
> course, 4321, 32-nm, LB5 orders, round at hand).
>
> I also had a some idea of which bells were affected at the calls, e.g which
> bell gets stuck at the back at the s14 s16 s18, where three calls work
> together to swap one pair (s9 s16 s18 in course 3 and s7 s14 s16 in course 5
> both swap 12), if you know what the c/o will be before the c/e it is (just)
> possible (for me) to work out which bells are affected and how at s16 18.
>
> As it happened there were very few mistakes, but I felt comfortable knowing
> that it was right every 5.5 minutes and that I was calling the correct
> course.
>
> I rang the 7th which (along with the 8th) is probably the easiest bell to
> call it off, for the obvious reason that it is only in two positions across
> the 5 parts.
>
> On a personal note, it wasn't 'my' band, Tim organised the peal after we had
> lost two previous attempts I organised (unsettled ringing on the run up to
> the second turning course and then we met short). There were several people
> in the band that I haven't rung with before - it's quite fantastic that
> people will ring to help a stranger.
>
> We were supposed to be ringing at Shoreditch, however, there was a concert on
> in the church such that we couldn't ring. We only found this out about
> about 530pm when we arrived for a 545pm meet. With a need to start at 615pm
> latest (to allow those that traveled furthest to get home) Tim and Richard
> somehow managed to organise everything such that we could start at Magnus at
> 614pm. I was extremely grateful not to be involved with the stress and
> organising. Third time lucky.
>
> Jack
>
> On 16 Jun, 2015,at 10:56 PM, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
>
> Looks like Jack and his band have now scored this:
>
> http://www.bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=467979
>
> Good stuff. Maybe he'll give us a mini write-up?
>
> MBD
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list