[r-t] Doubles 240s
dfm at ringing.org
Sun Mar 15 15:23:09 UTC 2015
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Robin Woolley <robin at robinw.org.uk> wrote:
> John said: "I don't recall him saying it was necessary"
> I didn't say he did.
I think John can be readily forgiven for having read what you did
write as implying that, however: "I remembered that Don had proposed
allowing to [sic] null change to enable 240s of Doubles with each row
at hand and back. This is unnecessary."
And, for what little it's worth, the ordinary ringers with whom I ring
do find 12345 singles easier than 123 singles, as to them, at least,
they feel just like the singles they are familiar with from Bob Minor.
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"A man is as old as his arteries, and as young as his ideas."
-- Will Durant, _Fallen Leaves_
More information about the ringing-theory