[r-t] Doubles 240s

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Thu Mar 19 15:04:06 UTC 2015

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Holroyd <holroyd at math.ubc.ca> wrote:
> Who would have thought that the question of whether or not I rang a
> peal of minor in which a row was immediately repeated would depend
> on legal precedent about marriages?

Any attorney paid at a sufficiently high hourly rate.

Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"It is the great beauty of the Law that it can dispute any human
statement, made under any circumstances, and reduced to any
form."        -- Wilkie Collins, _The Woman in White_

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list