[r-t] Doubles 240s

[Richard Johnston]

> Ander writes,
> 
> > Choice of terminology doesn't matter, folks!  Let's focus on the real
> > issues!
> 

MBD:
> The choice of terminology doesn't matter in this forum, no. However 
> whatever you call it, I am concerned that the wider ringing population 
> will in general be very suspicious of the identity change, and not wish 
> to (a) ring it, or (b) consider peals with it in to be peals. If so, I'd
> be on their side (to the extent as explained more thoroughly in my last 
> email).

Are there any historical examples of the use of the identity change?  
If there are, as is the case for jump changes, then a plausible case 
might be made for the inclusion of the identity, but not otherwise.

Richard Johnston