[r-t] Illegitimi

[David Richards]

Hi Robin,

>  Why has it taken so long for the ICTC to get around to doing this

A good and legitimate question. If one were being brutal, you could say
that about a lot of the ICTC's 'to do' list.
If we get to the end of this year and it still hasn't been done then at
least I should be able to provide an answer as to why. Hopefully being part
of both the ICT committee and the Methods committee will mean that the
transfer proceeds in line with the desire of all involved parties.


> b.t.w., isn't the Compositions Committee collection on a private site?

If you're referring to ringing.org, then the raw data is already being
mirrored by the ICTC (with special thanks to Leigh Simpson).


Cheers,
Dave.


On 28 May 2015 at 14:57, Robin Woolley <robin at robinw.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The answer to recent comments about methods.org.uk can be found at
> RW2015/445. This begs another couple of questions. Why has it taken so long
> for the ICTC to get around to doing this and will the RW directors with the
> appropriate skills facilitate this, especially the automatic updating of
> the data-base. It is no secret that Tony Smith has been doing it manually
> for years.
>
> In the old days, not knowing about the ICTC plans would have been passed
> off as just one of those things. In these intolerant days, we can safely
> say it is SFC.
>
> b.t.w., isn't the Compositions Committee collection on a private site?
>
> Best wishes
> Robin
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20150528/fa3f67d6/attachment-0004.html>