[r-t] Tenors together spliced maximus

[Jack Gunning]

> On 2 Jun 2016, at 12:58, Ian Fielding <Ian.Fielding at nbt.nhs.uk> wrote:
> 
> Jack,
>  
> Interested by your comment
>  
> “I think the reason is mostly because they don’t produce long runs, they don’t produce runs in all the normal lb c/os, and they don’t have any redeeming qualities which make up for it”.  
>  
> I thought Barford/Newgate  produced runs in all normal LB courses – additionally they produce a number of 56’s/65’s in a number of the LB courses e.g. 43652, 45236, 35426, 34562, 46325. The redeeming qualities thing is subjective and personally if I am ringing spliced I like the methods to be different – Barford (in particular) is a perfectly decent method in spliced.
>  

Like I said, I don't have a well thought out reason. 

Jack

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160602/0bc60570/attachment-0002.html>