[r-t] Blocks becoming methods

[Graham John]

On 2 June 2016 at 22:41, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:


> Any update on the doubles methods that in the early 60s were given names
> and accepted by the Council, but a little while later disavowed as having
> places that were longer than the powers that be then decided they liked?
> Can they all come back with the names they were originally given?
>

A collection of disallowed Doubles methods by Melvyn Hiller was published
via a link on facebook. I don't know whether this is all of them or not,
but as the methods are all shown in grid format, I have offered to add them
to Composition Library if someone can provide me with a list of their place
notations. That would at least mean than there is a reference point people
can use in the mean time. No one has come forward yet.

Graham
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160603/4af079e8/attachment-0002.html>